Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a revision lay against an order compounding an offence under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 after the assessee had accepted the compounding order and paid the compounding fee.
Analysis: Composition of an offence under section 47 is complete only when the assessee accepts the order and pays the fee, because compounding is treated as a bilateral arrangement by which the State agrees not to prosecute on payment of consideration. Once payment is made, the assessee cannot later challenge the completed compounding or reopen alleged mistakes in the compounding order. Such grievances, if any, had to be raised before payment, and after completion of composition there is no scope for revision under section 36 or section 38 in relation to the completed compounding.
Conclusion: The revision was not maintainable after payment of the compounding fee, and the petitioner was not entitled to interference with the compounding order.