Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sales tax dues under section 11-AAAA of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 had priority as a first charge over the bank's mortgage claim, and whether the revisional court could interfere with the court below's order.
Analysis: Section 11-AAAA creates a statutory first charge over the property of the dealer or other person for tax, penalty, interest and other sums payable under the Act, notwithstanding anything contrary in any other law. The provision was applied to pending claims and was held to govern the present dispute. The tax dues were recoverable as arrears of land revenue, so the Sales Tax Department was not required to institute a separate suit before asserting priority. The bank's status as a nationalised bank did not displace the statutory priority created by the Act. The revisional challenge also failed because the impugned order, even if assumed to contain an error of law, did not warrant interference in revision.
Conclusion: The statutory charge in favour of the sales tax dues prevailed over the bank's claim, and the revision was not maintainable for interference with the order below.