Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court rules in favor of PVC pipes manufacturer in eligibility certificate denial case under Sales Tax Act.

        Amit Plastic Industry Versus Divisional Level Committee and Another

        Amit Plastic Industry Versus Divisional Level Committee and Another - [1995] 96 STC 538 (All) Issues Involved:
        1. Denial of eligibility certificate under section 4-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act.
        2. Interpretation of the term "new unit" under section 4-A.
        3. Application of Mimansa Principles of Interpretation.
        4. Conditions for claiming exemption under section 4-A.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Denial of Eligibility Certificate under Section 4-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act:
        The petitioner, a proprietorship concern manufacturing P.V.C. pipes, applied for an eligibility certificate under section 4-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The application was rejected by the Divisional Level Committee on the ground that a weighing machine purchased by the petitioner was deemed old machinery since the firm M/s. Angad Enterprises, from which it was purchased, was found non-existent. The review application was also rejected, leading to the filing of this writ petition.

        2. Interpretation of the Term "New Unit" under Section 4-A:
        The court examined whether the weighing machine being old affected the eligibility for the certificate. The Explanation under section 4-A, introduced by U.P. Act No. 28 of 1991, was analyzed, which defines a "new unit" as an industrial undertaking set up between October 1, 1982, and March 31, 1990, meeting certain conditions. The court concluded that it is the industrial undertaking that must be new, not necessarily every piece of machinery. The weighing machine, not being a part of the industrial process but merely for weighing items, does not affect the new status of the unit.

        3. Application of Mimansa Principles of Interpretation:
        The court utilized the Gunapradhan axiom from the Mimansa Principles of Interpretation, which states that subordinate ideas must be adjusted to the principal idea. The principal aim of section 4-A is to encourage new industries. Therefore, conditions should not be interpreted narrowly to defeat this purpose. The court emphasized that the primary objective is to promote industrialization, and minor technicalities should not obstruct this goal.

        4. Conditions for Claiming Exemption under Section 4-A:
        The court discussed that conditions under section 4-A should be interpreted liberally. It referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, which differentiated between substantive and procedural conditions. Only substantive conditions must be strictly complied with. The court held that a minor component being old does not disqualify the entire unit from exemption. The conditions in section 4-A are meant to ensure the genuineness of new units, not to impose unreasonable barriers.

        Conclusion:
        The court quashed the orders dated May 20, 1988, and January 19, 1989, denying the eligibility certificate. It directed the respondents to issue the certificate within two weeks and rectify the assessment and recovery for the relevant years accordingly. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found