Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notification reducing the tax rate for hoteliers and restaurateurs continued to operate after the statutory amendment increasing the rate of tax, and whether section 8-A(3-A) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 applied to the notification.
Analysis: The notification granted relief in two connected ways: it identified a class of dealers and it prescribed a reduced rate of tax on the relevant turnover. On that basis, it was treated as a composite notification referable to both section 8-A(1)(a) and section 8-A(1)(b) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. Once the Legislature amended the Act and altered the rate of tax, the reduced rate under the notification could not survive unless the notification was severable in a manner that allowed the unaffected part to continue independently. The reduced rate and the class-based relief were not treated as severable for this purpose.
Conclusion: The notification did not survive the statutory amendment, and the turnover was liable to tax at 5 per cent. The decision was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.