Sales tax classification of antiseptic cream depends on dominant use and common parlance, not cream form alone.

Sales tax classification turned on the common and commercial meaning of the product and its dominant use, not its form alone. Creams and cosmetics entry covered preparations intended to beautify, improve or protect the body, but the antiseptic cream was licensed and marketed for medicinal protection against germs in cuts, abrasions, minor burns and skin conditions. On that basis, the product was treated as a drug rather than a cosmetic, and taxed at the lower drug rate under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947.

---

---

Issues: Whether Dettol antiseptic cream falls within the sales tax entry for cosmetics and creams, or whether it is to be treated as a drug for purposes of taxation under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947.

Analysis: The classification turned on the meaning of "cosmetics" and the scope of the relevant entry, which covered perfumery, perfumed oils and cosmetics including creams of all descriptions and varieties excluding dental creams. The Court applied the common parlance and commercial understanding of the words, noting that cosmetics are ordinarily preparations intended to beautify, improve or protect the body, while the product in question was formulated and licensed as an antiseptic preparation to protect against germs in cuts, abrasions, minor burns and skin conditions. The manufacturing literature and drug licence supported the view that the product was intended for medicinal and protective use rather than beautification.

Conclusion: Dettol antiseptic cream is not covered by the cosmetic entry and is taxable as a drug at the lower rate.

Ratio Decidendi: For sales tax classification, the true nature of a product must be determined according to its common and commercial parlance meaning and its dominant use, and a medicinal antiseptic preparation is not treated as a cosmetic merely because it is in cream form.

---