Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the purchase tax demand could be sustained under section 11(2) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 and the revisional power under section 21(1) could be used after the expiry of five years, or whether the case fell under section 11(5) of the Act.
Analysis: Section 11(2) applies where returns have been furnished but the Assessing Authority is not satisfied and seeks further attendance or evidence. Section 11(5) governs the situation where no return is furnished for the relevant period, and it requires assessment to be made within five years after expiry of that period. On the facts, the dealer had not furnished the purchase returns, and the demand was sought to be raised only after the statutory period had expired. The revisional authority could not circumvent the limitation built into section 11(5) by invoking section 11(2) and section 21(1).
Conclusion: The matter was rightly governed by section 11(5), and the purchase tax demand could not be sustained under section 11(2) or through revisional action after the expiry of five years.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the dealer has not furnished the relevant return, the Assessing Authority must proceed under the provision prescribing assessment within the statutory limitation period, and revision cannot be used to avoid that limitation.