Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pumps coupled with electric motors and mono-block pump sets sold for agricultural purposes fall under entry 18(i) of Part I of Schedule C, entry 44(b) of Part II of Schedule C, or the residuary entry 102 of Part II of Schedule C to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: Entry 18(i) specifically excluded electric motors and electric pumping sets, so the goods did not fall within the agricultural machinery entry. Entry 44(b) covered electrical instruments, apparatus and appliances. The terms were construed in their cognate sense, taking colour from each other, and in common parlance they denoted small, specialised implements or devices rather than machinery or plant. Applying noscitur a sociis and the common parlance rule in taxing statutes, items commonly understood as machinery could not be brought within entry 44(b merely because they were operated with electrical power.
Conclusion: The goods were not covered by entry 18(i) or entry 44(b) and fell under the residuary entry 102 of Part II of Schedule C. The question referred was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: In a taxing entry, machinery operated by electricity is not treated as an electrical instrument, apparatus or appliance unless the statutory language clearly brings it within that class; excluded items must then fall to the residuary entry.