Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 13AA of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, mandating deduction at source from payments to works contractors without any mechanism to exclude transactions not liable to sales tax, is unconstitutional for violating the equality clause and being confiscatory in effect.
Analysis: The deduction provision applied indiscriminately to all payments under works contracts, including pure labour or service contracts where no sales tax liability could arise. The provision contained no safeguard enabling the contractor to obtain a certificate or otherwise establish that the transaction fell outside the taxing field. In contrast, a comparable deduction scheme under section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, contained an express certificate mechanism protecting against excessive or unnecessary deduction. The absence of any comparable guidance, discretion, or remedial mechanism under the Orissa Sales Tax Act meant that the provision authorised deduction even in cases beyond the State's taxing competence under entry 54 and the constitutional restrictions governing sales tax on works contracts. Such an unchannelled and compulsory deduction was held to be discriminatory and confiscatory rather than a valid tax collection measure.
Conclusion: Section 13AA of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, was held unconstitutional and struck down.