Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a demand notice under section 11(3) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, which does not specify a date for payment not less than thirty days from service, is valid and can sustain certificate recovery proceedings, and whether the assessee's appellate remedy can survive upon quashing of such notice.
Analysis: Section 11(3) requires the demand notice itself to specify a date for payment, and the date must be at least thirty days from service of the notice. In the absence of such a specified date, recovery of the assessed tax and penalty cannot validly proceed. The defect goes to the root of the demand notice and, consequently, the certificate case founded on that notice cannot be sustained. Once the demand notice is set aside, the right of appeal, which accrues from service of a valid demand notice under section 20(1), revives when a fresh valid notice is served.
Conclusion: The demand notice was invalid, the certificate proceedings were unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to challenge the assessment afresh upon service of a valid subsequent demand notice.
Ratio Decidendi: A demand notice under section 11(3) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 must specify a payment date not less than thirty days from service, and a notice lacking that requirement cannot support recovery proceedings or defeat the statutory right of appeal.