Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's reduction of the enhancement in turnover from Rs. 65,89,000 to Rs. 6,00,000 gave rise to a question of law warranting reference.
Analysis: The assessment arose from a discrepancy in stock of broken rice and the assessing authority enhanced the turnover on an estimated basis. The Tribunal re-examined the material, rejected parts of the estimation as presumptive, took the market value of the detected broken rice into account, and fixed a lower enhancement after considering the overall facts, including the returned turnover. The Court held that the quantum of enhancement, where based on an appraisal of relevant facts and materials, is ordinarily a conclusion on facts. A question of law would arise only where there is no material at all to support the conclusion.
Conclusion: No question of law arose from the Tribunal's order, and the Court declined to answer the referred question.
Final Conclusion: The reference was not entertained on merits because the Tribunal's fixation of enhancement was treated as a factual determination based on relevant materials.
Ratio Decidendi: The quantum of enhancement fixed by the Tribunal on consideration of relevant facts and materials is a finding on facts and does not, by itself, raise a question of law unless it is unsupported by any material.