Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the employer could lawfully dispense with the disciplinary enquiry and remove the workman from service under Standing Order 32, and whether the removal order was sustainable.
Analysis: Standing Order 32 was construed as permitting dismissal without following Standing Order 31 only where the General Manager was satisfied, for recorded reasons, that it was inexpedient or against security interests to continue employment. The power to dispense with enquiry was held to be distinct from the power to impose punishment, and reasons had to show why holding an enquiry was not reasonably practicable or otherwise legally justified. The Court held that the recorded reasons must be germane to the issue and are open to limited judicial review to test whether they are a genuine basis for dispensing with enquiry or merely a cloak for arbitrary removal. On the facts, the order and the supporting record did not disclose valid, objective, and relevant reasons for dispensing with the enquiry, and the employer's action was found to be arbitrary and contrary to natural justice.
Conclusion: The removal from service was held invalid, and the appellant was entitled to reinstatement with consequential monetary relief.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, the dismissal was set aside, and consequential relief was granted to remove the stigma and compensate the appellant.