TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Kerala HC Upholds Penalties for False Returns under Sales Tax Act</h1> <h3>B. Radhamani Amma Versus Assistant Commissioner (Assessment), Agricultural Income-tax and Sales</h3> B. Radhamani Amma Versus Assistant Commissioner (Assessment), Agricultural Income-tax and Sales - [1994] 95 STC 347 (Ker) Issues:- Assessment under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 based on false returns for the years 1982-83 and 1983-84.- Imposition of penalties under section 45A of the Act for filing untrue and incorrect returns.- Challenge to the penalty orders by the petitioner on grounds of acting bona fide and lack of wilful submission of false returns.Analysis:The judgment by the Kerala High Court pertains to an assessment under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, where the assessee had consistently filed false returns for the years 1982-83 and 1983-84. The petitioner had suppressed significant amounts in the returns, leading to delayed payment of taxes due. The assessing authority initiated action under section 45A of the Act for filing untrue and incorrect returns, prompting the petitioner to challenge the penalty orders imposed.In defense, the petitioner claimed reliance on a part-time accountant for maintaining accounts and preparing returns. However, the assessing authority imposed penalties of Rs. 5,000 for the first year and Rs. 17,788 for the second year. The Deputy Commissioner confirmed the penalty for 1982-83 but reduced it for 1983-84. The petitioner contended that the false returns were not submitted wilfully and that the part-time accountant's actions were to blame. The court noted the substantial amounts suppressed and the delay in filing revised returns, casting doubt on the petitioner's bona fides.The court found that the petitioner's conduct, including the suppression of significant turnover, delayed filing of revised returns, and inconsistencies in monthly returns, indicated lack of bona fide intent. The authorities' concurrent findings against the petitioner were upheld, with no error warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Deputy Commissioner's fair reduction of the penalty for 1983-84 was acknowledged, while the penalty for 1982-83 remained at Rs. 5,000. Ultimately, the court dismissed the original petition, upholding the penalty orders and denying any reason for interference.In conclusion, the Kerala High Court upheld the penalty orders imposed under section 45A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, finding the petitioner's conduct not bona fide and justifying the penalties for filing untrue and incorrect returns. The judgment emphasizes the importance of accurate reporting and timely compliance with tax laws to avoid penalties and legal repercussions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
