Commercial parlance test for sales tax entries: later expansion of a taxing schedule did not apply retrospectively to Gramoxone.

Gramoxone was held, for the relevant assessment year, not to fall within entry 66 of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 as it then stood. The Court applied the commercial or trade parlance test and held that the original entry, covering only pesticides and insecticides, could not be widened by importing definitions from the Insecticides Act, 1968. It treated the later amendment adding fungicides, herbicides and rodenticides as enlarging the entry prospectively, not as clarifying the earlier position. Gramoxone therefore remained liable to multi-point tax, and the assessee's challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether Gramoxone, for the assessment year 1975-76, fell within entry 66 of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 so as to attract single-point tax, or whether it was liable to multi-point tax as a weedicide/fungicide not covered by the entry as it then stood.

Analysis: The relevant entry, as it existed prior to 13 September 1977, covered only pesticides and insecticides. The subsequent substitution of entry 66 by Act 7 of 1977 expressly added fungicides, herbicides and rodenticides, showing that those commodities were not previously included and that the amendment enlarged the scope of the entry. The Court applied the commercial or trade parlance test for construing items in a sales tax schedule and held that the meaning cannot be expanded by reference to definitions in the Insecticides Act, 1968. The legislative amendment was treated as declaratory of a wider post-amendment position rather than clarificatory of the original entry, and the expanded entry could not be used retrospectively to cover the assessee's turnover for the earlier assessment year.

Conclusion: Gramoxone was not covered by entry 66 of the First Schedule for the relevant assessment year and remained liable to multi-point tax; the assessee's challenge failed.

Final Conclusion: The assessment order was restored and the appeal was dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxing entry is amended to expressly add new commodities, the amendment is ordinarily treated as enlarging the entry prospectively, and the original entry must be construed in its commercial sense without importing wider meanings from another statute.

---