Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in refusing to accept the 'C' declaration forms as additional evidence.
Analysis: The assessee sought to produce correct declaration forms at the appellate stage. The first appellate authority and the Tribunal proceeded on the basis that adequate opportunity had been available below, but the Tribunal incorrectly assumed that the forms had been taken back and not resubmitted. In appropriate cases, additional declaration forms may be accepted at the appellate stage if the requirements of rule 61 of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, 1947 are satisfied. The Tribunal, having failed to examine the request in the proper factual perspective, did not lawfully reject the prayer for acceptance of the forms.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was not justified in refusing to accept the 'C' declaration forms submitted by the assessee.