Common parlance classification governs sales tax treatment of nuts, bolts and jacks as vehicle accessories.

For sales tax classification, ordinary nuts and bolts are to be identified by their common parlance meaning, not by the particular use made by buyers; as they were general fasteners and not specially adapted for automobiles or tractors, they were treated as iron and steel articles and not spare parts. A jack, however, was understood in common parlance as equipment associated with a motor vehicle and as a subordinate adjunct that adds to its convenience and utility, so it was classified as an accessory to a motor vehicle. The classification was therefore accepted for the jack and rejected for nuts and bolts.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether nuts and bolts sold by the assessee were to be classified as iron and steel articles or as spare parts of automobiles or tractors under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. (ii) Whether the jack sold by the assessee was an iron and steel article or an accessory to a motor vehicle.

Issue (i): Whether nuts and bolts sold by the assessee were to be classified as iron and steel articles or as spare parts of automobiles or tractors under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.

Analysis: The nuts and bolts were ordinary fasteners of general use and were not specially manufactured or adapted only for automobiles. Their character had to be determined by the manner in which they would be understood in common parlance and not by the particular use to which individual purchasers might put them. In sales tax classification, the use made by a customer is not determinative where the goods are not of a special or technical description. The same goods could not be treated as different commodities merely because the dealer also dealt in automobile spare parts.

Conclusion: The nuts and bolts were iron and steel articles and not automobile or tractor spare parts. They were taxable only at the rate applicable to entries 45 and 99 of the First Schedule.

Issue (ii): Whether the jack sold by the assessee was an iron and steel article or an accessory to a motor vehicle.

Analysis: A jack is not essential for the operation of a motor vehicle, but it is an adjunct that adds to the convenience and effectiveness of its use. An accessory is something subordinate to the vehicle that contributes to its utility or convenience. In common parlance, an automobile jack would be understood as part of the equipment associated with a motor vehicle rather than as a mere iron and steel article.

Conclusion: The jack was correctly treated as an accessory to a motor vehicle and taxable at the rate applicable to entries 138 and 125 of the First Schedule.

Final Conclusion: The revision cases succeeded only in part, with relief granted on the classification of nuts and bolts, while the classification of the jack as a motor vehicle accessory was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: For purposes of sales tax classification, goods not specially adapted for a particular use must be identified according to their common parlance or commercial understanding, and the particular use made by a purchaser does not alter their essential character; an article that serves as a subordinate adjunct to a vehicle may be treated as an accessory.

---