Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of the motor vehicle chassis by the dealer amounted to a "resale" under section 7(ii) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969, on the footing that the goods were sold in the same form in which they were originally purchased.
Analysis: The Tribunal had found, on the evidence of the purchaser's affidavit and supporting correspondence, that what was sold was the chassis after removal of the tank previously mounted on it. The mere lapse of time between purchase in 1968 and sale in 1974 did not, by itself, alter the character of the goods so as to take them outside the definition of resale in section 2(26), which requires sale of purchased goods in the same form in which they were purchased. The Court held that the Assistant Commissioner had erred in relying on depreciated book value and in disregarding the factual evidence showing that the chassis remained in existence and was sold in working order.
Conclusion: The sale was rightly treated as resale under section 7(ii) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969, and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods remain sold in the "same form" for the purpose of resale where their essential identity is preserved and the evidence shows that the article sold is the very purchased article, notwithstanding the passage of time or depreciation in books.