Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Deputy Commissioner was justified in exercising suo motu revisional jurisdiction to revise the appellate order and sustain enhancement of the dealer's turnover by 15 per cent for the assessment year 1969-70.
Analysis: The dealer had not maintained or produced the essential account books, including purchase vouchers, cash-book, ledger and stock register, and reliance on sales vouchers alone did not provide a trustworthy basis for determining the true turnover. Once the accounts were rejected, the assessing authority was entitled to estimate turnover by best judgment. The appellate authority had ignored the contradictory position taken by the dealer regarding production of purchase vouchers and had failed to apply the settled approach that, where no better material is available, a normal increase in business may be adopted as a reasonable basis of estimation. In these circumstances, the revisional authority was justified in correcting the appellate order.
Conclusion: The revisional order was valid and the enhancement of turnover by 15 per cent was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the dealer's accounts are unreliable and no adequate material exists to determine turnover, the authority may estimate turnover on a reasonable best judgment basis, including by applying a normal business increase.