Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the entire income from the partnership business could be assessed in the hands of the Hindu undivided family, or whether only the assessee's share income from the genuine firm was assessable.
Analysis: The business originally belonged to the Hindu undivided family and was later converted into a partnership firm. The firm had already been held to be a valid and genuine firm and entitled to registration in earlier proceedings. In view of that finding, the protective assessment made on the premise that the entire business income continued to belong to the Hindu undivided family could not stand. Only the share income attributable to the assessee in the genuine partnership firm was liable to be included in its hands.
Conclusion: The entire business income was not assessable in the hands of the assessee Hindu undivided family; only the share income from the firm was assessable, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a partnership firm has been finally found to be genuine and valid, its business income cannot be assessed in the hands of the erstwhile owner on a protective basis merely because the business was previously carried on by that entity; only the partner's share income is assessable.