Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tax arrears due from the transferor could be recovered from the petitioner as transferee under section 9(1) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, and whether the transfer of property could be treated as void under section 11AAA of the Act.
Analysis: Liability under section 9(1) arises only where the ownership of the business of the dealer is entirely transferred, and not merely when some assets or part of the undertaking are sold. The transfer deed did not show transfer of the running business, its stock-in-trade, goodwill, credits and debits, and the respondent authorities themselves proceeded on the footing that only the landed property had been sold. In addition, the petitioner's purchase was for consideration and before notice of the recovery proceedings, so the transfer could not be treated as void under section 11AAA. Most importantly, no finding was recorded by the assessing or recovery authority that the petitioner was liable under section 9(1) before proceeding against his personal properties.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not liable for the transferor's tax arrears under section 9(1) on the facts found, and the attachment and recovery steps taken against him were unsustainable.