Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tax could be collected at the check-post without serving notice in Form VI-B under rule 94(4)(a) of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, 1947, whether the check-post officer could arbitrarily fix the value of the goods for such collection, and whether amounts already collected were liable to be adjusted in assessment.
Analysis: Rule 94(4)(a) contemplates collection at the check-post only where defects or omissions in the way-bill are noticed or where evasion of tax appears, and in such cases notice in Form VI-B must be served to enable rectification or exercise of the option to pay the amount indicated. The amount indicated cannot be fanciful or arbitrary and, where a departure from the disclosed value is considered necessary, reasons must be recorded. Since the procedure is in the nature of an emergency measure, detailed adjudication is not envisaged, but the requirement of fairness and natural justice remains. Amounts already collected were directed to be taken into account at the time of assessment and adjusted against admitted tax liability under the third proviso to rule 36 of the Rules.
Conclusion: Check-post collection without the prescribed notice and without recorded reasons for departure from the way-bill value is impermissible, and the amounts already collected must be adjusted in assessment.