Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the supply of photographic blocks by the assessee was a contract of sale exigible to sales tax, or a works contract involving mainly skill and labour and therefore not taxable.
Analysis: The decisive test was whether the substance of the transaction was the production of an article to be sold as goods, or the rendition of work and labour for a customer. The assessee purchased materials, mounted the customers' designs on metal blocks, and sold the finished blocks for a composite price that included the cost of the block and labour. The customer supplied the design, and the assessee did not merely render a personal service or create something whose essence was skill alone. The prior authorities relied upon by the assessee were distinguished on facts, while the earlier local precedent and the principles governing sale versus work contract supported the view that the finished block had separate existence as goods and that property passed for a price.
Conclusion: The transaction was a sale of goods and not a works contract; liability to sales tax was upheld, and the revision failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the substance of the contract is the manufacture and supply of a finished movable article for a price, with the labour component being incidental and the article having independent existence as goods, the transaction is a sale and not a contract for work and labour.