Declared goods processing and resale exemption: conversion of iron scrap into round bars still qualified as resale.

Declared goods processed into M.S. round bars did not lose their character as goods within the relevant Schedule entry where the statutory description remained the same. Reading the definitions of "manufacture" and "resale" with rule 3(xvii), the Court held that the decisive test was whether the processed goods were taken out of the description of the declared goods in the Schedule. As iron scrap, ingots and round bars continued to fall within the description of "iron and steel", the conversion was not treated as manufacture for denying the resale deduction. The sale therefore qualified as resale and the turnover deduction was allowed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the sale of M.S. round bars manufactured from iron scrap by the assessee was a "resale" so as to qualify for deduction from turnover, or whether the conversion of iron scrap into ingots and then into round bars amounted to "manufacture" taking the goods out of the relevant description in the Schedule.

Analysis: The statutory definitions of "manufacture" and "resale" were read together with rule 3(xvii) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Rules, 1970. The decisive inquiry was whether the purchased declared goods, after processing, were taken out of the description of the goods specified in the relevant Schedule entry. The Court held that the words "description thereof" in rule 3(xvii) and the corresponding resale definition refer to the description of the declared goods in the Schedule entry, not to a narrower sub-item analysis that would defeat the exemption. On that construction, if iron scrap was converted into M.S. round bars but both continued to fall within the description of "iron and steel" in the relevant entry, the process did not disqualify the transaction from the statutory notion of resale. The Court distinguished the Supreme Court decision on separate taxable commodities, holding that the issue here turned on the special Gujarat definitions and the exemption-preserving purpose of the rule.

Conclusion: The sale of M.S. round bars was a resale, the assessee was entitled to deduction from turnover, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the department.

Ratio Decidendi: Where declared goods remain within the description of the relevant Schedule entry after processing, the activity does not count as manufacture for the purposes of the resale exemption, and the resultant sale qualifies as resale.

---