Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 43(1) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 was legally sustainable for the assessment period 1961 when the assessee did not include separately collected sales tax in the returned turnover.
Analysis: Section 43(1), as it stood in 1961, contemplated deliberate concealment of turnover or furnishing of a false return, which imports a guilty intention. The Tribunal recorded no finding that the omission was with a guilty mind. The assessee's explanation was that it bona fide believed separately collected sales tax was not required to be shown as part of the sale price, and on those facts the element necessary to attract penalty was absent.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 43(1) was not exigible on the facts of the case, and the question referred was answered in the negative in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty for deliberate concealment or false return cannot be imposed unless the authority finds a guilty intention, and a bona fide omission without such mens rea does not attract section 43(1) as it stood in 1961.