Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 45-B of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 could be sustained where the registered dealer had collected tax in accordance with the rate prescribed under Schedule II, but the aggregate collection ultimately exceeded the tax finally assessed.
Analysis: Section 45-B authorises penalty only when a person collects any amount by way of tax in contravention of section 45-B(1), that is, otherwise than in accordance with the Act and the Rules or in excess of the permitted collection. The material on record showed an admission by the revenue authorities that the petitioner had collected sales tax as per the rate mentioned in Schedule II. Once the individual collections were in accordance with the statutory rate, the mere fact that the total collection exceeded the tax ultimately found payable on final assessment did not establish a contravention attracting penalty. Penal provisions in a taxing statute must be strictly construed, and cannot be invoked on equitable considerations or on the basis of an after-the-event mismatch between collections and assessed liability.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 45-B was not leviable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty for collection of tax can be imposed only on proof of a statutory contravention in the manner of collection, and not merely because the aggregate amount collected exceeds the tax finally assessed.