TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Inclusion of Cold Storage Equipment in Dealer's Registration Certificate Upheld</h1> <h3>Commercial Tax Officer, X Additional Circle, Bangalore Versus Mac Charles Brothers (Private) Limited and Another</h3> Commercial Tax Officer, X Additional Circle, Bangalore Versus Mac Charles Brothers (Private) Limited and Another - [1991] 82 STC 162 (Kar) Issues: Scope of section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Inclusion of specific items in the registration certificate under the Act.In this case, the main issue was to determine the scope of section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, which pertains to the types of goods that can be included in the registration certificate of a registered dealer. The respondent had applied for registration of certain goods, which was initially rejected. The matter was taken to the High Court, which remanded it back for reexamination. The Commercial Tax Officer reexamined the matter and decided to include cold storage and refrigeration equipment in the registration certificate as they were deemed necessary for the manufacture or processing of goods for sale. However, other items requested for inclusion were rejected as they did not fall under the purview of the said section.The subsequent challenge to this decision in a writ petition was successful, with the judge opining that the items applied for registration were integrally connected with the ultimate production of goods. The government advocate argued against this decision, citing a Supreme Court ruling that goods used in the manufacture should not include fertilizers and pesticides. However, the High Court disagreed, stating that the items in question were indeed connected to the production process and should be considered part of the goods used in manufacture. As a result, the writ appeal was dismissed, upholding the decision to include the items in the registration certificate.Overall, the judgment delves into the interpretation and application of section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, in determining the eligibility of goods for inclusion in a registration certificate. It highlights the importance of considering the integral connection of items with the production process when making such determinations. The court's decision emphasizes the specific requirements and limitations set forth in the law regarding the types of goods that can be registered under the Act.
TaxTMI 