Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 5CC(2) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 could be sustained when the assessment proceedings were already time-barred and whether the limitation for assessment under section 10B applied to penalty proceedings.
Analysis: The revision concerned levy of penalty for alleged breach of the conditions attached to exemption under section 5CC of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954. The Court held that section 10B deals with assessment and its language could not be extended to cover imposition of penalty. Section 5CC(2) and section 10B did not create a separate mechanism enabling penalty in the situation before the Court, and no reopening proceedings under section 12 had been initiated. The Court also found that there was no explanation for the delay, since the audit report had been received in 1979 and the proceedings were commenced nearly four years later.
Conclusion: The penalty could not be sustained and the revision was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: A provision governing assessment cannot be stretched to authorise penalty proceedings, and where the initiating action is unexplainedly delayed, the resulting penalty cannot be upheld.