Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the turnover from supply of imported goods was exempt as a sale in the course of import under section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and whether the assessee acted merely as an agent under the actual user's licence and letter of authority.
Analysis: The import was made on the strength of the actual user's licence issued in favour of the college and the letter of authority, which restricted diversion of the goods and required delivery only to the licence-holder. The movement of goods was thus pursuant to a pre-existing arrangement between the licence-holder and the assessee, and the import could not be separated from the sale transaction. The presence of agency-like restrictions and the absence of liberty to deal with the goods independently showed an integral link between the import and the sale, bringing the transaction within the protected category of sales in the course of import.
Conclusion: The transaction was a sale in the course of import and was not exigible to sales tax.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are imported under an actual user's licence and a letter of authority that confines delivery to the licence-holder and prohibits diversion, the sale and import are integrally connected so as to attract section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.