Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed transactions were inter-State sales falling within section 3(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, or only agreements to sell/local sales taxable under the State sales tax laws.
Analysis: Clause (b) of section 3 applies only when there is a completed sale effected by transfer of documents of title during the movement of goods from one State to another. A mere endorsement of railway receipts during transit is insufficient unless the property in the goods has already passed as part of a sale. On the facts found, the purchasers were entitled to inspect the goods, reject them if not approved, and pay only after approval. The Tribunal's finding was that title passed only after delivery at destination, inspection, and acceptance, so at the time of endorsement there was only an agreement to sell and not a sale.
Conclusion: The transactions did not constitute inter-State sales under section 3(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and the question was rightly answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of section 3(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, inter-State sale taxation arises only on a completed sale effected by transfer of documents of title during movement of the goods; a mere agreement to sell does not attract the provision.