Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether prior approval of the Assistant Commissioner under rule 90-A(4) for assessment under section 12 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 required an opportunity of hearing to the dealer before sanctioning withdrawal from lump sum payment and regular assessment.
Analysis: The dealer had been permitted to pay tax in lump sum, but the sales tax authorities initiated regular assessment after finding that the gross turnover exceeded the statutory threshold. The rule only required the Sales Tax Officer to obtain prior approval of the Assistant Commissioner before proceeding under section 12 where the turnover condition was satisfied. The rule did not prescribe any pre-decisional hearing before according such approval, and the dealer was to have the opportunity to explain turnover in the regular assessment proceeding itself. Since the statutory condition for initiation of assessment was undisputedly satisfied, the approval could not be invalidated merely for want of prior notice or hearing. The suggested resort to section 12(8) was not examined further because no prejudice or legal advantage was shown.
Conclusion: Prior hearing before granting approval under rule 90-A(4) was not required, and the challenge to the assessment on that ground failed.