Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, where no return had been filed and a notice under section 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act had been issued but not served, the assessing authority was barred from making a best judgment assessment under section 7(3) of the Act.
Analysis: Section 7(3) and section 21(1) operate in different fields. Section 7(3) enables best judgment assessment where no return is filed or the return is incorrect or incomplete, and it does not make prior service of notice a jurisdictional condition. By contrast, section 21(1) applies to escaped assessment and requires not only issuance but valid service of notice before reassessment proceedings can validly commence. Mere issue of a notice under section 21, without service, does not foreclose the assessing authority's power to proceed under section 7(3). The cited authorities were distinguished on the ground that, in those cases, the assessment had in fact been made under section 21, whereas here the assessments were made under section 7(3).
Conclusion: The assessments under section 7(3) were valid, and the assessee's challenge failed.