Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate authority was justified in setting aside the assessment and remanding the matter for fresh assessment on the ground that the assessing officer had not properly scrutinised the material seized during survey.
Analysis: Section 9 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act confers wide appellate powers, including the power to confirm, reduce, enhance or annul an assessment, and in a fit case to set aside the assessment and direct a fresh inquiry. That discretion, though wide, is judicial and must be exercised on legal principles. Where the assessing authority has failed to examine relevant seized material, has not processed the entries found in survey, and has not properly investigated the facts necessary for a fair assessment, the appellate authority may rightly conclude that a fresh assessment is needed. In such circumstances, it is not mandatory that the appellate authority itself conduct the entire investigation.
Conclusion: The remand order was valid and the Tribunal was right in sustaining it.
Final Conclusion: The revision failed because the assessment was lawfully set aside for fresh consideration, and no error of law was shown in the appellate or tribunal orders.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessment has been made without proper scrutiny or investigation of relevant material, the appellate authority may in the exercise of judicial discretion set aside the assessment and remit the matter for fresh assessment.