Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in computing the period of three months from the date of detention for confirmation of a preventive detention order, the date of detention is to be excluded or included.
Analysis: The period prescribed by law for doing an act is ordinarily computed by excluding the first day and including the last day. The distinction between a period within which an act may be done and a time limit for doing an act supports that construction. Applying that rule to the statutory period of three months from the date of detention, the date of detention had to be left out of account. On that computation, the confirmation order was made within time.
Conclusion: The detention was validly confirmed within the prescribed period, and the contention that the confirmation was time-barred was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute prescribes a period running from a specified date for doing an act, the first day is excluded and the last day is included in computing the period.