Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rule 26A(2) of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983, insofar as it directed deduction from all payments in respect of works contracts, was ultra vires article 366(29A)(b) of the Constitution of India and section 25A of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981; and whether the expression "all payments" in the rule could be construed to apply only to payments for transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of a works contract.
Analysis: Article 366(29A)(b) permits levy only on the transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of a works contract. Section 25A of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 likewise authorises deduction only from the consideration payable for such transfer of property in goods. A construction of rule 26A(2) that embraced labour charges and other service components would expand the rule beyond both the constitutional fiction and the parent provision. To preserve validity, the rule had to be read in harmony with section 25A and article 366(29A)(b), so that deductions were confined to the goods component of the contract.
Conclusion: Rule 26A(2) was upheld only on a read-down construction. Deductions could be made solely from payments attributable to the transfer of property in goods involved in the works contract, and not from labour charges or similar service payments.