Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether retrospective cancellation of the first seller's registration certificate deprived the assessee of exemption on the footing that its sale was only a second sale and not the first taxable sale.
Analysis: The decisive question was whether liability could be fastened on the assessee merely because the first seller's registration was later cancelled with retrospective effect. Applying the scheme of section 3, particularly section 3(2), of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, the Court held that what matters is whether the first transaction is a taxable sale. Once the first sale is shown to be taxable, the purchaser's sale cannot be treated as the first sale merely because the seller was not registered or because the registration was subsequently cancelled retrospectively. The assessee had purchased the goods when the seller's registration was in force, and the later cancellation could not alter the character of the transaction for exemption purposes.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to treat its sale as a second sale and claim exemption; the reassessment order restoring tax was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: For single-point levy under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the exemption turns on whether the earlier sale is a taxable sale, not on the seller's registration status at a later date or on retrospective cancellation of that registration.