Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 barred sanction or launch of criminal prosecution for non-payment of sales tax dues under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969.
Analysis: Section 22 protects an industrial company from winding-up proceedings, execution, distress, or similar proceedings against its properties, and from further proceedings of that kind without the requisite consent. The provision does not extend to criminal prosecution for failure to pay sales tax collected from purchasers and payable to the Government. Sanction of prosecution is only a step prior to initiation of criminal proceedings and is not itself a barred proceeding under section 22. The restraint in section 22 also does not apply to prosecution as such, because the proceeding is against the company and not against its property. The contention based on the cited decision was rejected because that case did not involve criminal prosecution.
Conclusion: Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 does not bar sanction or initiation of criminal prosecution for non-payment of sales tax dues, and the challenge to the sanction order failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Protection under section 22 is confined to winding-up, execution, distress, or similar proceedings against the company's property and does not extend to sanction or initiation of criminal prosecution for statutory tax default.