Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether lucerne grass or lucerne leaves fall within the expression "vegetable" for the purpose of sales tax exemption under G.O. No. 1764 (Revenue) dated 05.04.1960, as amended.
Analysis: The expression "vegetable" in a taxing entry is to be understood in its common parlance sense and not in the broad botanical or natural-history sense. On that approach, the relevant enquiry is whether the item is ordinarily understood as a table vegetable or a class of edible vegetable matter used for human consumption. Lucerne was found to be capable of human consumption, to be used as food in some countries, and to possess nutritive value. Applying the common parlance standard, lucerne leaves, being a species of greens, answer the description of "vegetable".
Conclusion: Lucerne leaves are covered by the expression "vegetable" and are entitled to exemption. The Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The exemption entry was construed in favour of the assessee on the basis of ordinary market understanding of the term "vegetable", and the tax cases were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: In taxing statutes, the term "vegetable" must be construed according to common parlance, and edible greens ordinarily understood as vegetables fall within the exemption.