Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the second proviso to section 5(2)(A)(a)(ii) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act was attracted when tax-free scrap purchased for resale was used in the manufacture of mild steel rounds.
Analysis: The dealer had purchased scrap against a declaration for resale, but a portion of the scrap was used in manufacturing mild steel rounds. The question was whether such utilisation constituted use for a purpose other than resale so as to attract the second proviso and fasten liability. The Court followed its earlier decisions holding that mere use of the purchased scrap in manufacture, in the absence of a finding that the goods were not sold but were diverted for some other distinct purpose, did not attract the proviso. The issue was therefore covered by binding precedent of the same Court.
Conclusion: The second proviso to section 5(2)(A)(a)(ii) was not attracted, and the question was answered in the negative in favour of the assessee.