Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether footwear held in stock on 1 May 1979, and not previously taxed, was liable to tax under section 3-D(2) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: Footwear had earlier been taxable at the point of sale to the consumer, but from 1 May 1979 the turnover of footwear became taxable at the point of first purchase. The stock in hand on that date had been purchased earlier against form 3-A and had not suffered tax before the change in incidence. The Court applied the view that where goods remain in stock on the relevant date and are not already taxed prior to that date, they fall within the charging scheme under section 3-D(2) if sold to a person other than a registered dealer. The Tribunal had therefore committed no error in upholding taxability.
Conclusion: The footwear stock was liable to tax under section 3-D(2) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, and the revision was dismissed.