Undervaluation dispute requires transaction-wise scrutiny; retracted statements and weak documentary linkage led to remand for fresh adjudication.

Demand for differential duty based on alleged undervaluation could not be sustained on the present record, because the case depended on retracted third-party statements and private documents that were not fully linked to the assessee's clearances. The evidence did not justify a uniform finding that all clearances were undervalued to the extent alleged, although it did indicate some undervaluation and short-payment of duty. The adjudication also failed to examine each transaction under the post-1-7-2000 transaction value regime. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision after due opportunity and compliance with natural justice.

---

---

Issues: Whether the demand of differential duty and penalties based on alleged undervaluation could be sustained on the strength of retracted statements and private documents, and whether the matter required remand for fresh adjudication.

Analysis: The valuation dispute rested mainly on statements of dealers, employees, and documents such as a private pocket diary and records recovered from third parties. The statements of third-party dealers were retracted during cross-examination, and the private diary contained personal entries as well as references to goods not manufactured by the assessee. The documents recovered from one dealer could not be fully linked to clearances by the assessee, and the evidence was not adequate to support a uniform conclusion that all clearances were undervalued to the extent alleged. At the same time, the material on record did indicate some undervaluation and short-payment of duty, but the adjudication had not examined each transaction in the light of the post-1-7-2000 transaction value regime and the available evidence for individual clearances.

Conclusion: The impugned order could not be sustained as it stood, and the matter had to be sent back for fresh decision after granting due opportunity and following the principles of natural justice.

---