Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 14(4)(cc) of the A.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957 was merely clarificatory and could be applied to reassessments made after its insertion in cases where exemption or deduction had been wrongly allowed; and whether the reassessment of the turnover as first sales was valid.
Analysis: The provision was inserted to deal expressly with cases where deduction or exemption had been wrongly granted. The body of section 14(4) already empowered the assessing authority to proceed where turnover had escaped assessment or had been under-assessed, and a wrongly granted exemption or deduction could fall within either category. On that basis, the later insertion of clause (cc) did not create a new power but only clarified the existing power to assess the correct tax payable. The reassessment was also supported by the material on record, which showed that the turnover represented first sales within the State.
Conclusion: Section 14(4)(cc) was held to be clarificatory, and the reassessment was upheld. The issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a wrongly granted exemption or deduction is already covered by the pre-existing reassessment power in the escaped-assessment or under-assessment provisions, a later express insertion dealing with that situation is clarificatory and may be applied to sustain reassessment.