Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 22(6)(b) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act was sustainable where the assessee admitted on oath that unaccounted taxable goods were found in stock and tax had not been paid, notwithstanding objections regarding opportunity and mode of recovery.
Analysis: The assessee's statement recorded on oath contained a clear admission that goods worth Rs. 7,899 were unaccounted and that tax at 10 per cent had not been paid. On that categorical admission, the assessing authority was justified in levying penalty. The objections that adequate opportunity was not granted and that the amount was not deposited in the treasury did not warrant interference when the substantive liability stood admitted. The Tribunal and the appellate authority were therefore not justified in setting aside the penalty order.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 22(6)(b) was sustainable and the revision was allowed in favour of the Revenue.