Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the excess development rebate reserve was to be included in the computation of capital under the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964.
Analysis: The answer to the referred question depended on the proper treatment of the excess development rebate reserve while computing capital under the Second Schedule. The Court saw no reason to depart from its earlier Bench decisions on the same point, and held that the Supreme Court decision in Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd. did not directly govern the issue arising in the present references.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative, meaning that the Tribunal was right in holding that the excess development rebate reserve was not to be included in the computation of capital, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.