Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 could be granted on a notional credit basis when the assessee had not taken Cenvat credit at all because availing the concessional exemption under Notification No. 6/2002 was conditional upon non-availment of such credit.
Analysis: The assessee had opted for the concessional rate of duty under the exemption notification and, as a condition for that benefit, did not avail credit under Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. The claimed refund was not of any existing unutilised credit lying in the Cenvat account, but of a hypothetical credit said to be attributable to inputs used in exported goods. Rule 5 cannot be read in isolation from the scheme of the Cenvat Credit Rules. Credit must first be validly taken under Rule 3 before the question of its non-utilisation and refund arises. The explanation to Rule 3(7)(c) also recognises that where another rule or notification grants exemption subject to non-availability of credit, such rule or notification prevails.
Conclusion: Refund under Rule 5 was not admissible on the basis of notional credit where no credit had been availed in the first place.
Ratio Decidendi: Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules applies only to credit actually taken and remaining unutilised, and cannot be invoked to claim refund of a notional credit when credit was foregone as a condition of the exemption notification.