Processed betel nut classification: scented supari and gutka fell into the residuary sales tax entry.

Scented supari and supari gutka were not treated as processed betel nuts under entry No. 39 of Schedule II, Part III of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958. As "processed" was not defined, the court applied its ordinary meaning and held that processing requires a special treatment that converts raw material into a marketable form. Mere addition of scent, menthol, sugar, dhania and aniseed did not amount to such processing. The goods were therefore regarded as mixtures containing supari, not as processed betel nut, and fell within the residuary entry No. 1 of Part VI of Schedule II.

---

---

Issues: Whether scented supari and supari gutka are processed betel nuts falling under entry No. 39 of Schedule II, Part III of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, or whether they fall under the residuary entry No. 1 of Part VI of Schedule II.

Analysis: The expression "processed" was not defined in the Act, so its ordinary and natural meaning was applied. On that basis, processing was understood as a special process or treatment that converts raw material into a marketable form. Merely adding scent, menthol, sugar, dhania and aniseed to supari did not amount to processing of betel nut within the meaning of the entry. Scented supari and gutka were treated as mixtures of ingredients including supari, and not as betel nut raw or processed. Since they were not covered by the specific entry, the residuary entry was attracted.

Conclusion: Scented supari and supari gutka do not fall under entry No. 39 as processed betel nuts and are taxable under the residuary entry No. 1 of Part VI of Schedule II. The answer is against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

---