Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Housing Board, on selling old and unused forms, papers, dismantled material and empty cement bags, could be treated as a dealer carrying on business so as to attract tax under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: The statutory definitions of "dealer" and "business" required proof that the assessee was carrying on a business of buying, selling, supplying or distributing goods, or was engaged in trade, commerce, manufacture, or an activity incidental or ancillary thereto. The Housing Board was a statutory corporation created to execute housing schemes under governmental control, and its objects did not show that it was engaged in trade or commerce. The sales in question were of obsolete or unserviceable materials disposed of to clear space or as surplus from construction activity, and there was no basis to infer that those items had been acquired with an intention to carry on business in them. The earlier authorities relied on by the Revenue were distinguished, while the decisions holding that disposal of surplus or scrap material by such statutory bodies does not by itself amount to business were applied.
Conclusion: The Housing Board was not a dealer carrying on business within the meaning of the Act, and the disputed sales were not taxable in its hands.