Tribunal Rules Aircraft Food as Nil Duty: Preparations vs. Packaged Foods The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant company and its Finance Manager, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed. The packed food for ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal Rules Aircraft Food as Nil Duty: Preparations vs. Packaged Foods
The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant company and its Finance Manager, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed. The packed food for aircraft passengers was classified as "ready to eat packaged food" under CET sub-heading 2106.90.99, qualifying for a Nil rate of duty under Notification No. 3/2006-C.E. The Tribunal disagreed with the distinction made between "food preparations" and "ready to eat packaged foods," holding that the food in question falls under food preparations and is eligible for the Nil rate of duty. The earlier notification exempting such food preparations from duty payment was also considered.
Issues involved: Classification of packed food for duty imposition under CET sub-heading 2106.90.99, applicability of Notification No. 3/2006-C.E., and penalty imposition.
Classification of packed food: The Commissioner confirmed a duty demand on packed food for aircraft passengers as "ready to eat packaged food" under CET sub-heading 2106.90.99, attracting 8% duty u/s Sl. No. 30 of Notification No. 3/2006-C.E. The claim that the food is not excisable due to short shelf life and for coverage under Nil rate of duty u/s Sl. No. 42 was rejected.
Interpretation of 'food preparations': The Tribunal disagreed with the adjudicating authority's distinction between "food preparations" and "ready to eat packaged foods." It held that ready to eat packaged foods also fall under food preparations as per Chapter 21.06, which covers "foods preparations not elsewhere specified or included." Since the food in question is not cleared in sealed containers, it qualifies for Nil rate of duty under Sl. No. 42 of Notification No. 3/2006-C.E.
Applicability of earlier notification: The Tribunal noted that prior to the amendment introducing Sl. No. 42, the assessees were covered by Notification No. 15/06-C.E., exempting food preparations falling under tariff item 21069099 from duty payment during a specific period.
Decision: Considering the above, the Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalties imposed, thereby allowing the appeals of the appellant company and its Finance Manager.
Separate Judgment: No separate judgment was delivered by the judges in this case.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
