Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether revenue recovery proceedings could be initiated in respect of a tax liability when the revision petition concerning that liability was still pending, and whether the Deputy Commissioner was bound to decide the remanded revision in accordance with the Tribunal's direction.
Analysis: The revision petition filed by the assessee remained pending, and the Deputy Commissioner could not postpone its disposal until the outcome of other pending tax cases. Once the Tribunal had expressly directed disposal of the revision on remand, that direction was binding and could not be disregarded. In that situation, it was improper to proceed with recovery of the disputed liability by issuing notice for auction sale under the Revenue Recovery Act, because the liability itself had not attained finality.
Conclusion: The revenue recovery notice and the proceedings initiated under the Revenue Recovery Act were quashed, and the Deputy Commissioner was directed to decide the revision petition.