Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether confiscation of imported goods and the consequential penalty were sustainable merely because the importer did not produce a pre-shipment inspection certificate, when the goods were examined and found not to contain prohibited articles.
Analysis: The goods were inspected and were not found to contain any serviceable articles or arms and ammunitions. The absence of a pre-shipment inspection certificate, by itself, was held not to amount to improper import of goods within the meaning of Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962. The reasoning of the cited High Court decision was applied to hold that non-compliance with the certificate condition could at most result in inspection, not confiscation, where the goods themselves were not prohibited.
Conclusion: The confiscation and penalty were not sustainable and were set aside, and the appeal was allowed.