Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the coal purchases were effected outside the State of Bombay so that the purchase tax could not be levied by reason of Article 286(1)(a) of the Constitution of India and section 46 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953.
Analysis: The only material on record showed that the coal was despatched by the collieries in Bihar on f.o.r. basis to the nearest railhead in Bihar, that the assessees' agent inspected the goods there, and that actual delivery was taken at that railhead. Under the constitutional explanation then applicable, a purchase is deemed to take place in the State where the goods are actually delivered as a direct result of the sale for consumption in that State. Since actual delivery occurred in Bihar, outside the then State of Bombay, the deeming provision did not operate to treat the purchase as one taking place in Bombay. The passing of property in Bihar also supported the conclusion that the transaction was completed there.
Conclusion: The purchases were effected outside the State of Bombay and were not taxable as purchases within Bombay; the issue was answered in favour of the assessees.
Ratio Decidendi: For purposes of Article 286(1)(a), the place of actual delivery of goods pursuant to the sale determines whether the transaction is inside or outside the State, and if delivery is taken outside the State, the sale or purchase cannot be treated as having taken place within that State merely because property passed elsewhere.