Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the complaint and criminal proceedings under section 50(1)(j) of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 were liable to be quashed in exercise of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on the ground that no offence was made out and the defence pleas could be considered at the threshold.
Analysis: The complaint alleged that false information was furnished in the company secretary's letter regarding the place from which the goods were despatched and the destination of the consignments. The governing test for interference at the initial stage was whether, on the face of the complaint and accompanying papers, and without adding to or subtracting from them, no offence was disclosed. The objections based on trade practice, consignment sales, statutory exceptions under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and absence of mens rea were treated as matters of defence, suitable for consideration by the trial court and not for determination in proceedings under section 482.
Conclusion: The petition for quashing was not maintainable on the facts disclosed in the complaint, and the proceedings were allowed to continue.
Ratio Decidendi: Criminal proceedings may be quashed at the threshold under section 482 only when the complaint and accompanying material, taken as they stand, disclose no offence; disputed defence contentions cannot be examined for that purpose.